Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs?



Yes, that's the way I've done it in the past. Not a lot, though--only when I 
want something "slicker" than my own printer will produce.
--LRA


>From: Gordon Tassi <gtassi@erols.com>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs?
>Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:07:54 -0400
>
>Lynn:  I understand that the digital machines will also accept an image 
>that is
>given to them on a disk and that the machine can make the print from it.
>Wouldn't this allow you to controll all but the actual print process.  You 
>do do
>all the adjustments in PS, or other similar program, first to get the 
>control.
>
>Gordon
>
>Lynn Allen wrote:
>
> > Steve wrote:
> >
> > *There's* one very good reason for retaining total control--the lab will 
>do
> > the better print for the same price as the bad one, but you pay for both 
>of
> > them.  In your decision, you have to estimate how many of those you're 
>going
> > to have. Good luck. ;-)
> >
> >
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.