Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance

On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:39:48 -0700  shAf (michael@shaffer.net) wrote:

>       Afterall, did we ever blame enhanced Tri-X grain on the point 
> enlarger we preferred for sharp detail and increased contrast?

The odd thing is that this doesn't happen - at least no more than printing 
on a harder grade of paper provides. I did this some years ago: match the 
image contrast and you cannot see any difference even using a magnifier 
(same lens, same neg, same enlarger, different head). You do get less cack 
showing up from the diffuse head though. I put the condenser head away in 
a box as a result of this test, and it has stayed there ever since.


Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner 
info & comparisons


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.