Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance

> Rob Geraghty wrote:
> >
> > Dave wrote:
> > >Nikon scanners.  Specifically, I'd like to find out whether scans
> > >performed *without* ICE on the new scanners have the same
> > >with excessive dust and scratches as on the old scanners, or if
> > >has been improved, and if so, by how much.
> Hmmm... was the scanner *adding* the dust and scratches? I would
> have a scanner that gets as much info off of the film as possible,
> if there are dust and scratches on the film, they should be
> I'm funny that way...;-)
> Isaac

Adding isn't the right word exactly, let's say the Nikon without ICE
'exaggerates' dust and scratches.  So why not just use ICE then and be
done with it?  I do, except in the case of certain Kodachromes, which
exhibit artifacts with ICE scans that *are* added, and detract
significantly from image quality.



Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.