ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements



> I had understood that grain removal was a by-product of the ICE-type
> cleaning and therefore could not be separated.  If it can, certainly I
> agree
> that should be an independent option.
>

Not sure about VueScan, but ASF's GEM and ROC do not depend on ICE.  Two
separate sources for this statement: 1) Minolta's medium format scanner has
GEM and ROC but not ICE and 2) the patent that appears to be the basis for
ROC (#5,673,336).  The patent states that an IR channel is not necessary for
the removal of color crosstalk but that the process of removing crosstalk
improves the IR detection of defects.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.