ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: dither vs haltoning (was File sizes, file formats, etc. for printing 8.5 x 11and 13 x 17...



Austin writes ...

> >     "Halftoning" really has nothing to do with digital imaging ...
>
> I completely disagree.  Halftone is a process, and is implementation
> independent.
> ...

    I only separate "halftoning" and "dithering" chronologically
(traditionally), as in "halftone" is the original analog process, and
"dithering" is the method by which halftoning is digitally
implimented.  I don't have a problem with QMS or Epson having
"halftone" settings ... it probably best describes the resulting
"effect" of the setting ... i.e., imitating traditional halftoning.
    ... and I don't have references for "dithering" ... I use it is a
general term for putting discrete dots together ... for whatever
purpose.

shAf  :o)




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.