ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Tweaking images in PS6



-----Original Message-----
>>  Is it better to do all possible tweaking in 48 bit
>> mode, one after the other, which needs rendering the picture each
time, or
>> is it better to convert the image to 8 bit and use adjustment
layers which
>> renders the image just once.

>48bit, definitely, is better for data precision.

>From fairly unscientfic messing around here, applying layers doesn't
actually
>seem to give be any less destructive than successive separate
operations. The
>advantage appears to be flexibility and workflow AFAICT.
>Tony Sleep

I experimented with correcting old Ek slides using layers in PS and
found that when printed on an EPSON 870, it appeared that there was a
greenish layer over the original image. When I worked on the image
directly and printed it on the same printer it looked normal, i.e. no
green haze. Was I doing something wrong in not combining the layers
before printing?

Orion Knox




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.