ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems



You could cut out a little piece of the original image and put it up for
examination. Cut the same piece out of the corresponding jpeg.

Frank Paris
marshalt@spiritone.com
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of
> austin@darkroom.com
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 8:42 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: RE: RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems
>
> I don't believe anyone is going to take a 50M image file and post
> it to the web for us to see, that is just silly.  The only way to
> make a 50M image reasonably viewable (say 800x600 @ 100DPI) on
> the web is to resample it.  That renders it pretty much useless
> for any type of detailed image comparison, which was my point.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.