Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems



> > How are you going to see ANYTHING on a crappy web image 
> > at 72DPI?  I do not believe that would be useful at all.

>       The JPEG may load with a res setting = 72ppi, but 
> the bitmap of pixels will be the same as if the res had 
> be defined at 300ppi.  Julie only needs to "re-define" 
> the resolution (or image dimensions) without "re-sampling" 
> the bitmap.

I don't believe anyone is going to take a 50M image file and post it to the web 
for us to see, that is just silly.  The only way to make a 50M image reasonably 
viewable (say 800x600 @ 100DPI) on the web is to resample it.  That renders it 
pretty much useless for any type of detailed image comparison, which was my 
point.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mail2Web - Check your email from the web at
http://www.mail2web.com/ .




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.