Filmscanners mailing list archive (email@example.com)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.5 Available
In a message dated 1/29/2001 2:13:27 PM EST, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
> I need to admit a bit of confusion regarding Ed's conventions for new
> versions. They are his own of course, but if I were to make a
> suggestion it would be to update the 2nd digit whenever, he changes
> how the primary scan is measured, exposed, or scanned.
There's seldom anything I do that changes the raw scan file. The
long exposure pass could possibly be considered something that
changes raw scan files, but not really.
I once had a boss who got tired of the 1.1.a2.pre-beta types of
long hierarchical version naming conventions that some
companies use, and he laid down a rule - software versions
were to be integers, and every new version, no matter how minor,
got a new version number. This worked surprisingly well.
I'd be the first to admit that there isn't much logic behind which
digit I increment. In my own mind, when I'm particularly pleased
with the new features I've added I increment the second digit.
This is usually about 80 hours worth of work. I worked 10 days
straight, some days till 3 in the morning, getting the new
"Options|Restore colors" feature working. It's quite a subtle
new feature, but it works surprisingly well.
My next big bit of work is to add better grain removal and
dust removal. I found some references to Sigma filters
on the web that look very promising along with another
type of filter that should work very well. I'll roll the second
digit when I get this done.
I'll roll the first digit if I make significant user interface