ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Dust brush for Polaroid 4000]



Sounds good.  I think I will try the pipe cleaner approach without the
carrier, to make sure I don't disrupt anything.  I can see the area the
carrier goes through around that fin or groove, and I also see some
insulated wires which are probably the connections to the sensor that
needs cleaning, so I will try to clean in that area with a pipe cleaner
or something similar.

Thanks,

Art

halftone@troutcom.com wrote:

>Yes, the camera I have was bought for another purpose and I didn't
>care that its macro capability is poor.
>
>What comes to mind is a long pipe cleaner that fits well in the
>channel. All you need to do is drop the front door and you can see
>the channel quite clearly. Choose the appropriately-sized pipe
>cleaner and go to it.
>
>
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.