[filmscanners] RE: film and scanning vs digital photography

["Laurie@advancenet.net" <laurie@advancenet.net>]

You may be right.  The commercial drum scanners are much more flexible and
complex allowing for very subtle adjustments and corrections via much more
complicated software that often requires a trained, accomplished, and
experienced scan master to make full use of - sort of like a pressman on an
offset press.  Most prosumer scanners and software allow for as much control
as does the drum scanner hardware and software; and most prosummers do not
want to take the time to learn the steep learning curve involved in
mastering the ins and outs of such control.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of Michael
> Kersenbrock
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 5:22 PM
> To: laurie@advancenet.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography
>
> Laurie@advancenet.net wrote:
> > Secondly, some artifacts produced in the scanning process by
> prosummer
> > scanners operated by layoperators may not be readily remedied or
> correctable
> > at all in some cases.
> And I'm sure THEY don't want to do any corrections, even if possible.
>
> Mike K.
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message
> title or body


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body