ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Why DSLR ouput looks sharper?



At 10:02 PM -0400 9/12/03, Johnny Johnson wrote:
>At 07:10 PM 9/12/03 -0600, Berry Ives wrote:
>
>>I notice that there have been no comments at all on the new Olympus E-1
>>DSLR.  I guess it is too early for folks to have any experience with it.
>>They have an interesting take on digital, that the light hitting the chip
>>should be coming in perpendicularly, and not obliquely:  film grain is fine
>>with oblique light, but chips are not, they say.  So they built the camera
>>"from the ground up" as they said, optimized for digital and not trying to
>>use 35mm lenses.  Anyone bought it yet?
>
>Hi Berry,
>
>It's not on the market yet.  I believe the release date is a few weeks away.
>
>Later,
>Johnny
>

A person on the Leica User's Group mailing list has one; he's got
connections to Olympus. Unfortunately, the pictures he's posted so
far have not been of the type to enable critical examination of the
benefits of the Olympus' optical designs.

--
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.