ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: comments on using NikonScan/PC




>Very interesting. I would really like to get to the truth on this, darn
>it!  I hope Jack Phipps will comment further on your specific example,
>because I want to know ONCE-AND-FOR-ALL whether ICE (as implemented in
>the 4000ED) set to "notmal" will or will not degrade an image.

My guess is it may depend on each one's workflow and type of images as
well. I did some careful testing with my system and was unable to detect
any general sharpness loss due to ICE in minimal setting. I am going to
test it again too...

Roger Eritja

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.