ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Repeated "Tonal correction", is it god?


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Repeated "Tonal correction", is it god?
  • From: "Nagaraj, Ramesh" <Ramesh.Nagaraj@ca.com>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:51:56 -0500
  • Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
  • Thread-index: AcLp+meRKdwev6mxS2WQDpQRuUw7swARvcIw
  • Thread-topic: [filmscanners] RE: Repeated "Tonal correction", is it god?
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk



-----Original Message-----
>> LAURIE SOLOMON wrote..

>The one question which neither you or
>I (or anyone else for that matter) has answered is the one in the Subject
>Line of the thread : "is it god?"  I have no answer to that.  Do you?

It's indeed "good". As you said, you/we can not answer "..god?" question, its 
more controversial / complicated than 
8/16 bit and tonal correcions.

Thanks 
Ramesh

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.