ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Repeated "Tonal correction", is it god?



Hi Michael,

>   That didn't come out of my mouth ...<g>... and I do not agree.
> More tonal
> detail and subtlties, yes ... but if the scanner is capable of highbit
> scanning, and you ask for delivery of 8bit instead of highbits, the same
> tonal range is delivered.  Consider PS converting a highbit file to 8bits
> ... does the tonal range change because to converted?  It's the
> same thing.

You can get the exact same tonal RANGE, yes, it was the detail within that
tonal range that is obviously reduced when converting to 8 bits.  Now,
whether you can actually make use of that extra resolution if another issue.

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.