Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Canon IDs vs Pentax 67II



My understanding of the physics of the imagers is that you get much better
performance if you keep the imager dark until you take the image.  So the
image quality does depend on the shutter.  And by keeping the imager dark,
you don't have to reset it prior to capturing the image so you minimize
shutter lag.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Austin Franklin" <austin@darkroom.com>
To: <karlsch@earthlink.net>
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 12:07 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Canon IDs vs Pentax 67II


Hi Karl,

> for SLR digicams, there is a real shutter.

It has to do with the sensor type, and interline sensors, that the cheapo
digicams use have an electronic shutter.

> That's in part why
> they have so
> much better image quality

They have better image quality because the sensors are so much better, not
because they use a shutter!

> and less shutter lag than consumer
> digicams.

I don't believe that has anything to do with the shutter, I believe it's the
sensor and camera design, shutter or not.

> I can elaborate on why later.

Please do ;-)

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.