ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: digital artifacting


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: digital artifacting
  • From: "Tim Schooler" <tschooler@cox-internet.com>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:38:50 -0600
  • In-reply-to: <20030115011843.PAJS3176.fe1@wan-a-97.adsl.alcom.co.uk>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

At 12:00 AM 1/15/2003 +0000, you wrote:

>Yes, they _appear_ to look better, but you don't know what is
>real data and what is artifacting.



This can be said of any current digital camera. And D60 images sharper
than scanned provia? I must have had a lemon.


        Best Regards,

        Tim Schooler

http://www.timschooler.com



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.