ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Newish Digital Tech




"Arthur Entlich" <artistic-1@shaw.ca> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>
My eyes say it solves some, even many, of the CCD problems in color
digital camera use.
<<<<<<<<<

You still haven't told us what these "problems" are.

(The uneasiness that many people have with "interpolation" doesn't count as
a problem<g>.)

>>>>>>>>>
  I'm not the only one that feels that way.  I think
the concept of the chip is elegant and brilliant in its simplicity of
design,
<<<<<<<<<<

It's a neat design.

>>>>>>>>>>>
 and that the future of image capture will benefit from this
technology being available.
<<<<<<<<<<<

But what will a Foveon chip with an anti-aliasing filter do that an
equivalent pixel count Bayer sensor won't? If you want your camera to not
have an anti-aliasing filter, then you have to argue that it's acceptable to
report 9 line patterns as being 5-line patterns of a lower frequency. I'm
willing to listen to that argument.

David J. Littleboy
davidjl@gol.com
Tokyo, Japan

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.