ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Re:WAS(scanner/film combinations/Fujichrome Trebi)



I typically shoot Provia but from time to time try other chromes.  I haven't
noticed that Provia poses any greater challenge to scan than other
emulsions, despite the fact that Vuescan treats it as "generic."  I'm using
a SprinScan 4000 for 35mm and an Epson 2450 for 120.  The dominant variable
is proper exposure rather than the emulsion, IMHO.

-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 9:59 PM
To: bkubiak@attbi.com
Subject: [filmscanners] Re:WAS(scanner/film combinations/Fujichrome Trebi)


I'll have to try it when I get back to my friendly film lab in Queensland.
Push or pull processing on slide film seems dangerous when slide film
exposure latitude is so narrow (but yes I understand the processing is
supposed to commpensate).  It would be interesting if Provia 100F could be
made more scanner friendly.

Rob



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.