ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: slides vs negs


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: slides vs negs
  • From: "Rob Geraghty" <robg@wordweb.com>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:14:26 +1100
  • References: <3DFACCCE0015B363@mta2.wss.scd.yahoo.com> (added by postmaster@mail.san.yahoo.com)
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

"Jeff Scribner" <scribjs@scribnerdesign.com> wrote:
> Okay, I found an example of slide vs. negative film for your viewing
> pleasure and posted them on my company site.

Come to think of it, the grain shots I did of various films show this
comparison - at least the USAF target was always the same, and the setup the
same but unfortunately I didn't have the means to use studio lighting (but
then I was more interested in the behaviour of the films in sunlight).  I
ended up removing all those pics from my web site. :(

Rob




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.