ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: My best scanner/film combinations -ideal film



Julian,

Kodak is listening to your pleas apparently because they announced that  and
Supra are to be replaced by Royal Supra, combining the best qualities of
both. It should be released this winter, BUT no longer in ISO 100, they say
the 200 film can double for that.

Robert

> And I meant to thank you and someone else (gone in the mists of e-time)
for
> suggesting Fuji Superia 100 as a good scanning neg film. I have never used
> it so will try it. Until now I have been stuck between Supra and normal
> Kodak Gold.  (I like the grain better on Supra but the colour on Gold).  I
> think Kodak Royal Gold is/was considerably better than common person Gold,
> but I can't get any of this any more, and not even sure if it is still
made.
>
> Julian
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.