ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Memory requirement for PC with scanner




>> I second the idea of scanning using a separate machine.  
>> Even though W2K task manager shows that there is about 50% 
>> CPU load scanning using Vuescan (was 100% on a P200), trying 
>> to run anything alongside Vuescan is virtually impossible 
>> for me. 

I find that turning down the application's priority using Task Manager
(I set it to 'below normal' on Windows XP) gives me a bit more CPU time,
meaning I can still read my email, etc, whilst scanning, if necessary.

Mark

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.