Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
  • From: "Jack Phipps" <JPhipps@asf.com>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:33:12 -0600
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

Actually, the Nikon 8000 has a diffuse light source.

Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction

-----Original Message-----
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 4:14 AM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000



> Yes, I have found the above to be true.  While I was testing a
> Nikon 8000ED,
> I was totally blown away by how superb ICE worked with that scanner! I
> currently have the Minolta Scan Multi Pro on which ICE does a much poorer
> job!

But the Nikon "has" to have ICE to be competitive, as the light source
exacerbates scratches that would not even appear on a non-LED (diffuse light
source) scanner...

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.