Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
- To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
- From: "david/lisa soderman" <scapes@wi.net>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 08:11:16 -0600
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
> But the Nikon "has" to have ICE to be competitive, as the light source
> exacerbates scratches that would not even appear on a non-LED (diffuse light
> source) scanner...
>
> Austin
Austin, I find your above statement to be quite interesting.
Have you ever actually experienced a full rez scan of a negative on the
Minolta Scan Multi Pro? If so, please describe what you saw *with* and
especially *without* ICE.
Meanwhile, we dasn't forget that the Minolta light source is reported to be
of the "cold" variety, (non-LED), which allegedly fosters cleaner scans.
Joyfully, -david soderman- <><
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
