ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
  • From: "Jack Phipps" <JPhipps@asf.com>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:35:10 -0600
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

Hi Art. Yes the Acer 2740S, now the Benq 2740S and the UMax scanners are all
less than the price of the SS4000/SS4000+. They all have Digital ICE.

Jack



-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Entlich [mailto:artistic-1@shaw.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000


Is there one at anywhere near the price of the SS4000/SS4000+? ;-)

Art

Moreno Polloni wrote:

>>>I may be biased because I own the SS4000s, but even if I was hired by
>>>
> Applied Science fiction I would not change to an inferior scanner for the
> sake of digital ICE. :-)<<
>
> Would you, however, change to a superior scanner with ICE?


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.