ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Photoshop (on Mac) bogs, VueScan hoggingprocessor?


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Photoshop (on Mac) bogs, VueScan hoggingprocessor?
  • From: "" <EdHamrick@aol.com>
  • Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 06:52:19 EST
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

In a message dated 1/23/2002 11:31:22 PM EST, julianv@mindspring.com writes:

> I used a similar utility (Peek-a-Boo 1.6) to monitor the CPU usage for
>  VueScan 7.5b1 running under Mac OS 9.2.2.  I started VueScan and put it
>  into background without doing anything.  The monitor showed that VueScan
>  is using about 50-60% of CPU time while idling in background.  Not very
>  nice (in the unix sense and in common parlance).

It's a wxWindows problem.  When running on Windows it uses 1%
of the CPU when idle, and the Mac OS version uses exactly the
same source code.  I just tested 7.5 beta 3 on OS X, and it indeed
uses between 30% and 40% of the CPU when idle.

If anyone wants to fix this, the source code for wxWindows is on:

  http://cvs.wxwindows.org/

Regards,
Ed Hamrick

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.