Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Polaroid Sprintscan 4000



Is the USB on the SS4000+  USB 2.0 or 1.1?

Have you compared any scans from the Plus with the SS120? Do you know the
rated Dynamic Range of the Plus? I'm hoping it's 3.9 like the SS120, since
both are 14-bit systems. That would mean an extra 1-2/3 stops of range over
the 4000, which is substantial.

Lloyd

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@attglobal.net>
To: <lodaniel@bham.rr.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 6:24 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Polaroid Sprintscan 4000


Remember, the SS4000+ is BOTH USB and Firewire. Clearly the Firewire
performance matches the SCSI performance.

Having had the opportunity to test the SS4000+, I have to say it is an
outstanding scanner, just as the SS4000 is.  Right now, David is absolutely
right, though.  The differences are small enough that it reinforces that the
SS4000 at the current prices is an outright steal. I paid over $1500 for my
SS4000 and am still pleased with the investment.

Tom

From: "Charles Stirling" <stirling@ndirect.co.uk>
<snip>
Personally I am more interested in a SCSI than a USB connection as it
sounds like it could be quicker but what do others find in this regard?

Charles Stirling



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in the
title or body



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in the 
title or body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.