Filmscanners mailing list archive (email@example.com)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: filmscanners:minolta and med format
>My initial question was in regard to "adivse" on film scanner
>capable of handling medium format...That question got no reply so I
>began trying to sort out the sales mumbo jumbo and specs and
>$$$$...which led to the realization that some Minolta scanners do
>not actually scan an entire 120/220 area in one pass,,,that I must
>"stitch" the image together in Photoshop...At least that is what I
>think you are telling me( the Minolta info DOES NOT SAY THIS as
>such...they state interpolation in regards to their max DPI ....It
>does seem pretty underhanded that a Mfg would not specify this
>clearly...never the less..I do not want to get invilved with this
>"Stitching" process...and now I wonder if any other Mfg's imploy
>similiar techniques...Totally confused.
>It's the Scan Multi Pro that does medium format.
>Are you talking about scanning an image that's bigger than what the scanner
>can handle (say 6x17) and then stitching in Photoshop? Or, are you talking
>about the way the scanner gets to 4800 dpi for medium format?
>Scanning a 6x17 would pretty much be the same as either the Polaroid or
>Nikon except that you'd have to reposition the film in the holder. For 4800
>dpi for mf, supposedly the Minolta doesn't actually interpolate but scans
>pieces and then stitches. I don't know the particulars of this but it does
>seem to actually get more usable detail from MF transparencies at 4800 vs.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andy D'Angelo [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 7:50 AM
>> To: email@example.com
>> Subject: Re: filmscanners:minolta and med format
>> does anyone have any experience or advise re. using the Minolta
>> medium format scanner(dimage Scan II) and their stiching software.
>> ??I understand these med format scanners scan 35mm portions of the
>> 120 and "stitch" the scans together,Does/will this work as well as
> > scanning the entire image?
> > Andy
> > --