Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 ppi film scanner



Tom's statement is completely contrary to my experience. I 've used the
SS4000 for about a year and a half and I don't spend on average 2 minutes
cloning dust spots or scratches. To this point, I wouldn't have used the
infrared channel even if I had it. Regards, Ron Carlson
----- Original Message -----
From: "tom" <ch_fs@yahoo.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 6:53 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Canon 4000 ppi film scanner


> > I'm still at this junction struggling between choosing SS4000 or
> > FS4000, although for about 90% settled for SS4000.
>
> I do not want to say that FS4000 is better choice
> but IMO scanner without infrared channel is just a mistake. You will spend
> hours
> on dust and scratches removing.
>
> Tom
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
> http://personals.yahoo.com
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.