ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 ppi film scanner



I have an Artixscan 4000 (similar to SS4000) which has scratches removing
hardware, so I may confirm the penible many hours of retouching (even with a
Wacom tablet).

As I print up to A3+ and I tend towards sometimes too much perfectionism, I
have already thought this as an inevitable step because I read many times
that scratches removing software always softens the image.

Now, the doubt came and I never saw other scanners nor I know in the world
outdoors (in this and some other lists I feel like home   :-)     ) other
persons working in digital. Usually, I am not pressed by time when I work.

The scratches removing software has negligible side effects even in A3+
prints or my penible many hours of retouching are worth? TIA.

Mário Teixeira
mjteixeira@yahoo.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "tom" <ch_fs@yahoo.com>

| > I'm still at this junction struggling between choosing SS4000 or
| > FS4000, although for about 90% settled for SS4000.
|
| I do not want to say that FS4000 is better choice
| but IMO scanner without infrared channel is just a mistake. You will spend
| hours
| on dust and scratches removing.
|
| Tom
|
|
| __________________________________________________
| Do You Yahoo!?
| Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
| http://personals.yahoo.com
|


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.