ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Announcements for SS4000+



Yes David, you're probably correct, I just hoped there will me some kind of
ICE or similar
technology incorporated.
BTW, what do you mean OD ?

What about greater dynamic range ? Shall the difference be noticeable or
more theoretical also ?

Regards, Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Hemingway, David
J
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 17:43
To: 'filmscanners@halftone.co.uk'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Announcements for SS4000+


It is real and in fact some members on this list are currently Beta testing
the unit. The SS4000+ has USB and firewire(with feed-through). OD is better
from 12 to 14 bits. Although the difference is real I think you would be
hard pressed to easily see that difference in an image at least from a
practical sense. Yes you may see it looking at pixel level in Photoshop but
on the printed image probably not.
Frankly if it was me I would purchase the current SS4000 given it great
value.
David

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Alex Z [mailto:alexz@zoran.co.il]
Sent:   Sunday, October 07, 2001 8:54 AM
To:     Scanners List
Subject:        filmscanners: Announcements for SS4000+

Anyone saw any announcements for new version of SS4000 (probably called
SS4000+ ) or just
rumors only ?


Sincerely,
Alex




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.