ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Silverfast or Polarscan



I agree.  Anyone who can't get good scans with Insight or SilverFast probably haven't learned how to use them.  In the case of SilverFast, I can understand that.  Vuescan isn't all that easy to use either, from what I've seen on this list.

In a message dated 9/24/2001 2:11:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ilyons@mac.com writes:


As for the SS 4000, go with Vuescan.
> Using both Polarscan and Silverfast, I got terrible results.


You might wish to try version 5.5. Both Insight and SilverFast will produce
excellent scans. Insight is VERY easy to use and whilst SilverFast is
initially quite complex it has the capacity to produce scans from the SS4000
that VueScan users can only dream about (that's not a criticism of VueScan)




Ian Lyons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.