ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows



>This is probably because you are usually using a process that is grabbing
>sufficient memory to prevent the file cache getting big enough to block
>every other process.

You could be right.

>File servers are the most likely machines to be afflicted with this
problem.

But wouldn't file servers be using Windows NT or 2000 rather than Windows 98
as their operating system?  If so this appears to run counter to Rob's
comments: "In fact the bug applies to all versions of Windows other than
those in the NT class (NT 4.0 and Win2K)...."

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Steve Greenbank
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 3:49 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows


This is probably because you are usually using a process that is grabbing
sufficient memory to prevent the file cache getting big enough to block
every other process.

File servers are the most likely machines to be afflicted with this problem.

It may come and bite you anytime so unless your feeling really lucky you may
wish to look at my post just above this one.

Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "LAURIE SOLOMON" <LAURIE@advancenet.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 7:18 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows


> Funny, I have two systems with more than 512 MB of RAM installed on them
and
> using Win 98 and have not experienced any problems of the sort you
describe.
> I have experienced problems with the motherboard not being able to resolve
> conflicts in timing between different types of 168 pin DIMMs but no
> operating system related problems.  One of my systems has 758MB of RAM and
> the other has 640MB of RAM.  Maybe I am just lucky. :-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 12:12 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows
>
>
> I'm just about to plug another 256MB of RAM into my computer and I thought
> I'd better check up on a bug I'd heard mentioned in relation to Windows
> 98.  In fact the bug applies to all versions of Windows other than those
> in the NT class (NT 4.0 and Win2K), not just 98.  I think Microsoft's
> suggested
> workarounds on MSDN are hilarious.  I wish I could move to Win2K, but I
> am reasonably certain that the combination of hardware and software I have
> will not work in that environment.  So here's the warning in case you plan
> to have more than 512MB RAM in your Windows 95, 98, 98SE or ME computer:
>
> >The Windows 32-bit protected-mode cache driver (Vcache) determines the
> maximum
> >cache size based on the amount of RAM that is present when Windows
starts.
> >Vcache then reserves enough memory addresses to permit it to access a
cache
> >of the maximum size so that it can increase the cache to that size if
> needed.
> >These addresses are allocated in a range of virtual addresses from
> 0xC0000000
> >through 0xFFFFFFFF (3 to 4 gigabytes) known as the system arena.
> >
> >On computers with large amounts of RAM, the maximum cache size can be
large
> >enough that Vcache consumes all of the addresses in the system arena,
> leaving
> >no virtual memory addresses available for other functions such as opening
> >an MS-DOS prompt (creating a new virtual machine).
> >
> >WORKAROUND
> >To work around this problem, use one of the following methods:
> >
> >Use the MaxFileCache setting in the System.ini file to reduce the maximum
> >amount of memory that Vcache uses to 512 megabytes (524,288 KB) or less.
> >
> >For additional information about how to use the MaxFileCache setting,
click
> >the article number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge
> Base:
> >
> >Q108079 32-Bit File Access Maximum Cache Size
> >Use the System Configuration utility to limit the amount of memory that
> Windows
> >uses to 512 megabytes (MB) or less.
> >
> >For additional information about how to use the System Configuration
> utility,
> >click the article number below to view the article in the Microsoft
> Knowledge
> >Base:
> >Q181966 System Configuration Utility Advanced Troubleshooting Settings
>
> >
> >Reduce the amount of memory that is installed in your computer to 512 MB
> >or less.
>
>
> Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
> http://wordweb.com
>
>
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.