ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Re: autolevels was re: filmscanners: Vuescan blue anomaly



Maris wrote:
> Sometimes you can't use anything - rather than using the
> eyedropper you just have to guestimate - trial and error -
> until the number for a near-white spot are near-white but
> not-quite-white numbers.

OK, let me rephrase the question slightly - isn't the intention of the black
and white point to define where the minimum and maximum brightness points
are?  If so, why is a point of sun reflection in a photograph not a good
point to use for the white point?  Because it's not representative of the
majority of the image?

Rob


Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
http://wordweb.com






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.