ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Matrox G400 vs G450



Not much difference in performance. The G450 was cheaper to produce and the
chip ran a bit colder. The G400 I think was a two chip card. The G450 a 1
chip card. The G550 has just been announced.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Kehl" <bobkehl@kvernkehl.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 10:02 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Matrox G400 vs G450


> I've been thinking about buying a Matrox G450 with the dual head feature
due
> to recommendations on this list.  I just bought a workstation that will
come
> with a Matrox G400.  For scanning and tweaking in PS6 is this card going
to
> do as well as the G450 or should I upgrade.  What is the difference
between
> these two cards?  Looking at the Matrox web site, it does not seem
apparent
> to me.  Any help?
>
> Bob Kehl
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.