ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street



Art,
  You certainly do have a point.  For me, though, it's certainly not as much
profit as I'd like!
Dave

Arthur Entlich wrote:
> I've never quite understood why publishing an image in a newspaper is
> considered "not for profit"... does the name Randolph Hearst (and
> granddaughter Patti) and Conrad Black not ring any "top income bracket"
> bells? ;-)... Rosebud.
>
> (This is somewhat tongue in cheek, I do understand the concept of
> editorial images)




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.