Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding

To: Filmscanners <Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding
From: Johnny Deadman <john@pinkheadedbug.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 17:34:02 -0400
In-reply-to: <383831118.990306480561.JavaMail.root@web168-ec.mail.com>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

on 5/19/01 5:08 PM, Lynn Allen at lalle@email.com wrote:

> Same here. I'm wondering why that hasn't already become fact

why'd you think?

because camera manufacturers want to sell cameras, not camera backs!

force the punters up the upgrade mountain!

kick 'em! whack 'em! prod 'em! but make sure they buy cameras!
-- 
John Brownlow

http://www.pinkheadedbug.com

References:
- Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding
  - From: Lynn Allen <lalle@email.com>

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: OK, Vuescan is driving me nuts
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread