Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: 110 film
You have a good point. I've seen many reports regarding digitizing Minox
8x11mm that combining optical enlargement and scanning resulting prints may
be a better compromise.
However, I think you must realize that the 110 format probably didn't
produce the best negative or transparency because it relied on a plastic
cartridge to hold the film flat and at the precise film plane.
Bob Wright
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Wilkinson <michael@infocus-photography.co.uk>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: 110 film
> Ive scanned some 110 trannies for a family member ,otherwise Id have
> said no !
> I Drum scanned at 4000 dpi and we then printed via the epson to around
> 5x4 inches.
> the results were acceptable inasmuch as they provided a memory of an
> occasion,but award winners they were not .
> Perhaps a better way would be to have them printed at a Mini lab,some of
> them must still print 110,then scan the prints.
> I believe the results would be more acceptable.
>
> Just my Euros worth.
> regardsMichael Wilkinson. 106 Holyhead Road,Ketley, Telford.Shropshire
> TF 15 DJ
> michael@infocus-photography.co.uk www.infocus-photography.co.uk
> For Trannies and Negs from Digital Files
>
>
|
