ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?





Arthur Entlich wrote:
> 
> IronWorks wrote:
> 
> > Is a PC100 chip sufficient for Win2K?  Microsoft's site recommends the PC133
> > minimum.
> >
> > Another possibility for some might be a dual boot system with 98SE and also
> > 2K.
> >
> > Maris
> >
> 
> Does Win 2K require a 133mHz motherboard bus?  Can WIN 2K run on a
> Celeron system CPU which uses a 66mHz bus?
> 
> Art

No problem with my old machine with PC-100 memory. I don't believe it will
have any problem with PC-66 systems. But honestly Pc-66 systems are very SLOW
comparing to PC-133 systems.

Quoton




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.