ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application RAM



With  the Windows 2000 family of operating systems, only Windows 2000
DataCenter Server can access 64GB memory. The standard Windows 2000
Professional and Server editions have a maximum of 4Gbyte. Advanced Server
can handle 8 GByte, but only with Xeon processors.

mike

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of uoton
Sent: 07 March 2001 07:24
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Win2k and application RAM




Mike Finley wrote:

> I don't think this is right. There is a total 4GB adressable space,
> including virtual memory. Some of this is probably reserved for the
> operating system, probably reducing the maximum for the application to
2GB,
> possibly 3GB. If I have time I'll look into this when I'm in the office
>
> mike

I happened to be assembling a new PC in the past few days.

4GB is not the max Intel CPU can address. With paging under protected mode
the
max is actually 64GB. Only systems classified as servers will have that kind
of
memory
capacity. I picked up an IWILL main board cheap (less than $100) which
claims
to support
1.28GB. Well, it does not. I put in two 512MB and one 256MB dimm into it, it
only sees
768MB. I settled with only 512 in it. It is a single CPU PC. I managed to
get a
933MHz
Pent III for it.

The reason to replace my old one with this new PC is for my Minolta scanner.
I
bought it
used a few months back. It is a Dimage Multi I. I am planning to spend
another
$100
for the software update to make the model from I to II, which has the ROC
and
GEM
features that have really made me dream about it for a long time.

Well, ROC and GEM will lengthen the scan time much much longer. It will
demand
lots
of memory and CPU speed. I have access to a server that supports up to 4GB
with

2 CPUs in it. I'll see if I can make a comparison between my new PC and that
server
to see if more memory and CPU will really help much. The server has exactly
4GB
of
memory in it.

However, I am a little reluctant at this point to jump in and get the
software
update before
someone can tell me that ROC and GEM really work great.

Quoton








 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.