ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Oops?



One advantage of chromogenic B&W film over the "silver stuff" ;-) is
that you can use IR cleaning methods on the scan (dICE, etc).

Art

lists@lazygranch.com wrote:

> It's been my experience that chromogenic film is even harder to scan
> since it has an extremely wide latitude. I guess the problem here is we
> don't know exactly what the complaint is regarding the Nikon CSV and
> scanning B&W film. That is, is it noise, an odd looking image due to a
> funny gamma, etc.
>
> Chromogenic film is great stuff for long exposure night shots. Light
> sources don't bloom in the image as much as compared to regular film. I
> like the Kodak Portra 400BW for this purpose.You can expose it at ISO 50
> to bring out the areas not near light sources.
>
> Berry Ives wrote:
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.