Simon Lamb wrote:
>A shame Bart didn't provide an insight into using the built in diffuser on
>the scans of the child rather than showing us how poorly Neatimage gets rid
>of grain and softens the image.
>
Really? Is NeatImage so poor? [asked Petru who just spent $75 for
NeatImage two days ago :) ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
