Geez I was all ready to buy one now I have to look around again.
:-(
Barry T
-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:00 PM
To: barry@nwsca.com
Subject: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Tue 17 Jun, 2003
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Topic: [filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Mon
16 Jun, 2003
============================================================================
=======
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:02:00 -0500
From: "Clive Moss" <chmphoto@sbcglobal.net>
----------------------------------------
The review says:
"In our testing, we had the CanoScan connected via its SCSI port to a
slightly aging PowerMac G3 433 MHz CPU, with 192 MB of RAM, and the =
scanning
software running in a 170 MB partition. Here are the times we measured =
for a
maximum-resolution RGB scan of our black/white resolution target film:"
--=20
Clive
> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk=20
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of barry
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:58 AM
> To: chmphoto@sbcglobal.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest]=20
> filmscanners Digest for Mon 16 Jun, 2003
>=20
>=20
> Was this a USB or SCSI connection measurement.
>=20
-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-
Topic: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Mon 16 Jun, 2003
================================================================
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:57:42 -0400
From: "barry" <barry@nwsca.com>
----------------------------------------
Was this a USB or SCSI connection measurement.
Doug which are you using?
Barry T
-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 7:00 PM
To: barry@nwsca.com
Subject: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Mon 16 Jun, 2003
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Topic: [filmscanners] Canon FS-4000 Scan Speed
=========================================
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 23:30:49 -0400
From: "Doug Franklin" <jehosephat@mindspring.com>
----------------------------------------
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:21:51 -0500, Clive Moss wrote:
> review. He measured between 6 and 12 minutes per scan at maximum
> resolution, depending on options chosen. [...] Is that a real number?
It sounds about right to me. I like the scanner, but it _is_ slow.
> How much faster does it scan at lower res -- or to ask the question
> differently -- at what res would it take about a minute for a full frame
> scan?
Couldn't tell you. It does scan faster at lower resolutions, but I've
never timed it.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-
-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
