Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: comments on using NikonScan/PC



> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of Dieder Bylsma
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:06 PM
> To: frankparis@comcast.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: comments on using NikonScan/PC
>
>
> >
> >As I understand ICE, it only softens exactly where the dust
> spot was,
> >and not on any other part of the image, so I'd assume the total
> >"softening" (if true) is only noticeable when a slide is
> very dirty or
> >has unusually sharp, fine details?
>
> in fact, this is not the case. you can see this even on
> Applied Science Fiction's web site of ICE samples.
>
> <http://www.asf.com/gallery/ice/film/imagepages/image13.shtml>
>
> As well, I've noticed that ICE does have a bit of a
> 'blurring' effect that helps for CCD noise.

I don't have ICE (SS4000) so I can't try this for myself. But after ICE
softens the image, can you put a judicious amount unsharp masking into
the image to restore the loss of sharpness without degrading the image
much?

Frank Paris
frankparis@comcast.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.