Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Epson Perfection 3200 vs dedicated


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Epson Perfection 3200 vs dedicated
  • From: "Langan" <langan@mac.com>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:29:41 -0800
  • In-reply-to: <200304022355.h32Nt9TL027776@smtpin02.mac.com>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

First here is the very positive review on the Epson 3200 Scanner

        http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/interactive/Scanners/Epson_3200/
page_1.htm


I have just had a 3200 Pro delivered and scanned several 50-year-old
35-mm Kodachrome slides.  I used the Epson driver in Photoshop 7.0 with
a MacG4 and OSX.  I am happy but realize there is a learning curve upon
which I have embarked.

First results are inconsistant, but is it me?  Even in this
inconsistancy they are very useful for the web and casual prints.  I
have yet to investigate Silverfast and Monaco.

My prior experience was with a Polaroid 2700 dpi SCSI input and this
seems better.  Far easier to use.  Firewire connection is fast and
productivity is way up!  Cannot compare to the 4000, but the reviw
above did.

Lee Langan


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.