ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: scanning for web or preview


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: scanning for web or preview
  • From: "Roger Smith" <rsmith@unb.ca>
  • Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 19:17:09 -0400
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

At 10:23 AM -0500 3/30/03, Ed Verkaik wrote:
>You only need 72dpi, 4x6" for that purpose. Do
>you scan at that size, or go larger and downsize?  Are there any quality
>issues that matter either way, if just for review?

        Any scanner I've used gave terrible results scanning at
72ppi. Much better to scan at some higher resolution and downsize.
Some suggest scanning at a multiple of the scanner's native
resolution (like 360 or 720 for a 2800 ppi scanner).

Regards,
Roger Smith

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.