ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: over resolving scans


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: over resolving scans
  • From: "G. R Harrison" <gh50@btinternet.com>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:09:41 +0100
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJGEGLCEAB.darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

Mr Entlich said:

BZZZZZT.  B&W films have very LOW density ranges in the overall spectrum of
density ranges of films.  You're lucky if you find a density range of near 2
from B&W print film.
===============================
This simply is not true: an examination of film characteristics in Adams'
"The Negative" for example, will show half-a-dozen examples to the contrary.
See especially Kodak Plus-X Professional treated with selenium toner.  From
the first usable density of 0.3 above Fb+F (Film base + Fog) to 2.7 the
curve is practically linear.


George Harrison


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.