Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: FS4000


Thanks for the input on the SS4000+

I was leaning toward the Canon, but now I'm having second thoughts. If I
read you correctly, the Canon FS4000 is really good for the money, but is it
enough ?

I see the price differential in terms of scanning time and noise in the

PS: Also gotta thank Art on this one.

----- Original Message -----
From: <HMSDOC@aol.com>
To: <am1000@videotron.ca>
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 3:21 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: FS4000

Andre,  I have used the FS4000 until recently, and now have a Polaroid SS
4000+.  Unfortunately, I can't help you with the black and white film
question, as I have not scanned black and white on either machine.  I can,
however, tell you that I find the Polaroid to have a lot less noise in the
shadows...not that the FS4000 was bad, but there was enough difference to
easily tell which machine did the scanning.  I found both to have excellent
sharpness.  The Polaroid scans quite fast (I have it on a firewire card).  I
only used the FS4000 on a USB connection and it was extremely slow.
I am glad to have gotten the Polaroid, but the FS4000 was certainly worth
money, as it is significantly cheaper.


Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.