ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: How does Minolta Scan Dual 2 compare with Nikon LS-30?



Many of my films are old and scratched through poor processing labs, so I
have found Digital Ice (and Vuescan's IR-channel dust & scratch removal)
invaluable.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian" <jackswan@ntlworld.com>
To: <mlidaka@Ameritech.Net>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:02 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] How does Minolta Scan Dual 2 compare with Nikon
LS-30?


Further to my earlier post about the Nikon, I have also seen a Minolta
scan dual 2 being sold secondhand, how does this compare? As I am in the
UK our prices are somewhat more expensive, so what should I expect to
pay for this Minolta. I understand that it has no Digital Ice, but does
this make a lot of difference?

Julian
Wales
UK


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.