[filmscanners] RE: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

["Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>]

> > I agree...but I simply won't let this egregious misinformation be
> > proliferated without refute ;-)
>
> Perhaps Austin you should make up a web page detailing everything that has
> been discussed here in the past and simply point people to it whenever you
> consider them to have confounded technical terms. It would save a lot of
> collective groaning everytime the subject rears its ugly head and
> may save a
> few people from hitting the unsubscribe button!

Hi Tony,

Yes, you are absolutely right, and I am working on it.  It would save me a
LOT of repetition...

Before doing this though, I've been doing some research on the history of
Dynamic Range, which I thought would be a good way to shed some light on
understanding it...at the least, it would give a factual basis for it's
"inception".

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body